检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:兰跃军[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京市100088 [2]重庆工商大学法学院,重庆市400067
出 处:《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第5期108-113,共6页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"刑事被害人人权保障机制研究"(06XFX015);项目负责人:兰跃军
摘 要:刑事案件撤销导致刑事诉讼程序终结,可能使被害人追诉请求落空,导致被害人"二次被害"。从被害人视角看我国刑事案件撤销制度,它完全就是一个由侦查机关按照行政程序作出刑事决定的过程,既剥夺了被害人的知情权、参与权,又限制了被害人获得救济权,有悖程序公正的基本要求。因此,应当借鉴域外先进做法,按照正当法律程序的要求进行改革,加强撤案过程中被害人的人权保障。The end of criminal proceedings as a result of the withdrawal of criminal cases is likely to fall victim to the pursuit of the request,and at last lead to the victim "secondary victimization".From the perspective of victims in criminal cases of revocation of China’s system,it is entirely an administrative procedure by the investigating authorities made in accordance with the criminal decision-making process,and has not only deprived the victim’s right to know,the right to participate,but also limits the right of victims to obtain relief.It is contrary to the basic requirements of procedural fairness.Therefore,we should learn from the advanced practice in other countries to reform in accordance with the requirements of due process of law,to strengthen the protection of victim rights in the process of withdrawal of criminal cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173