打开陪审团暗箱:事实认定的法庭结构理论分析  

Opening the Black Case of Jury: Analysis on Fact-Finding by Theory of Court Structure

作　　者：陈卫东[1] 陆而启[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《江苏行政学院学报》2010年第5期101-109,共9页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute

基　　金：陆而启主持的2009年教育部人文社会科学研究项目<法官事实认定的心理学分析>(批准号:09YJC820058)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：陪审团制度的结构因素有三:一是陪审员个体素质的外行特征;二是陪审团事实认定集体交流方式和秘密色彩;三是陪审团与法官组成的二元审判法庭。为准确认定事实,英美法系裁决人员的心理素质和组成结构成为证据排除规则、法官指示规则以及裁决标准的规范形成和制度运行的前提条件。虽然我国陪审制度与英美法系陪审团制度都有制约国家权力、强化民众认同的民主价值以及事实认定和法律适用的双重功能,但是由于陪而不审、审而不判、议而不决,作为民主象征的我国陪审员参与审判制度需要在陪审法庭的随机组成和陪审裁决的公众认同上下功夫。There are three structural factors in the jury system： one is nonprofessional character of individual juror, the other is collective communication and covert deliberation of jury＇s verdict delivery, the last is binary judicial tribunal composed by jury and judge. To correctly ascertain the fact, mental disposition and composing structure of Anglo-American decision-makers, as mentioned above, is a forming and operating presupposition of norms and systems such as evidence exclusionary rule, judge＇s instruction rule and standard of proof. Our people＇s assessor system has the same function of checking to state powers, strengthening public approval, fact-finding and law implementation as Anglo-American jury system. Whereas, in our system of people＇s assessors, a symbol of democracy, the assessors participate in court by just accompanying but not examining, examining but not judging, deliberating but not determining, so we should stress on the random composition of assessor＇s court and public approval on their verdict.

关 键 词：陪审团 法庭结构 证据规则 事实认定 

分 类 号：D915.182[政治法律—诉讼法学]