检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:劳国权[1] 林城标[1] 张伟东[1] 彭文雄[1] 童峰[1] 陈亚钦[2] 刘宇明[2] 翁春良[2]
机构地区:[1]华南农业大学医院外科,广东广州510640 [2]广东省化州市人民医院神经外科,广东化州525100
出 处:《医学信息(中旬刊)》2010年第9期2301-2302,共2页Medical Information Operations Sciences Fascicule
摘 要:目的:探讨治疗急性重型脑出血的有效办法。方法:采用YL-1型颅内血肿微创清除术治疗38例急性重型脑出血患者(治疗组)与传统开颅术(对照组)进行比较。结果:治疗组的总有效率达81.58%,对照组的为56.76%;治疗组和对照组治疗前与治疗后,以及治疗组与对照组治疗后的神经功能缺损积分值比较,均有显著性差异;治疗组治疗后的神经功能恢复明显优于对照组。结论:采用YL-1型颅内血肿微创清除术治疗急性重型脑出血患者,临床疗效好,能提高病人生存质量,改善病残程度,降低致残率及病死率。Objective:To discuss the clinical curative treatment of acute serious cerebral hemorrhage.Methods:Treats 38 patients suffered from acute serious cerebral hemorrhage with YL-1 model intracranial hematoma microscopic wound treatment (the treatment group).Observe the results and compare with the result of the traditional craniotomy (the contrast group).Results:The total effective rates of hematoma treatment group were 81.58%,while the total effective rates of hematoma contrast group were 56.76%.Treatment group and control group before and after treatment,and treatment group and control group after treatment compared neurologic deficit score value,there were significant differences;The recuperation of nerve functions in the treatment group obviously better than the contrast group.Conclusion:Using YL-1 model intracranial hematoma microscopic wound treatment to treat the patients suffered from acute serious cerebral hemorrhage,can improve the clinical curative effects,and improve the patients' living quality,mending invalidism,and decreasing handicapped and dead rate.
关 键 词:颅内血肿微创清除术 YL-1型穿刺针 血肿冲洗液 传统开颅术 急性重型脑出血
分 类 号:R743.34[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130