检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学深圳研究生院,广东深圳518055 [2]西北大学公共管理学院,西安710127
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2010年第10期168-173,共6页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:中国高教学会"十一五"重点课题"高教大国向高教强国的战略转移研究"(06aig01900030)
摘 要:学术R&D经费是支撑博士规模及衡量培养质量的关键指标。测算发现,中美博士人均学术R&D经费存量差距显著,增量差距进一步扩大。协整分析和格兰杰检验的结果表明,美国学术R&D经费与博士规模存在长期稳定的动态关系,短期学术R&D经费投入是刺激博士规模增长的单向格兰杰原因,长期互为格兰杰因果关系。而在中国两者尚未形成良好的联动机制,据此提出我国要继续加大R&D经费投入,构建政府多部门的协同决策机制,平衡科研机构与高校系统的关系以及改革博士培养模式等建议。Academic R&D funding is a key indicator to measure the quantity and quality of PhD cultivating. The statistical analysis points that the gap of per-capita Academic R&D funding between China and America is significant and expands further. Co-integration test and Granger causality test shows that there exists a stable runlong equilibrium between Academic R&D funding and quantity of PhD, and the Academic R&D funding is the granger cause of the quickly increasing of PhD quantity in short-term, and it is the reciprocal causation in longterm. In China the Academic R&D funding and quantity of awarding doctorate has not formed a run-long stable equilibrium. We advise to invest more funding, to construct collaboration decision mechanism in govermnents, and balance the relations of research institutes and U&C, to reform the model of doctor cultivating.
分 类 号:C962[经济管理—人力资源管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31