论案件事实的查明——从民事诉讼实践的角度  

On Finding the Facts——Interpretation from the Perspective of Civil Trial

作　　者：丁小巍[1] 汪毅 

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院,广州510000 [2]广州市中级人民法院,广州510000

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2010年第9期72-77,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

摘　　要：民事案件审理中,案件事实的查明是审判进行的重要前提。从案件事实的性质出发,指出案件事实的性质是"法律空间"内的"法律真实",而非绝对的客观事实。进而提出查明案件事实应采用"层层剥笋法",即法官最先确认当事人的自认或者通过司法认知和推定可确认的无需举证的事实,然后根据当事人的诉请和答辩确认争议焦点,之后再根据争议焦点和当事人提交的证据在自由心证的基础上查清相关事实,最后对于根据双方证据还无法查清的事实通过证明责任规则予以认定。The core of trial is fact-finding and law application. In civil trial fact-finding is an important premise. This paper begins with an elaboration on the nature of the fact of the case,showing that the nature of the case-fact is not the absolute objective fact,but the legislative fact in legislative domain. Then the paper points out that fact-finding is just like peeling the bamboo-shoots,which means the judge first has to ascertain the litigant＇s confession or the truth identified and presumed by the administration of law which does not have to be proved,secondly,ascertains the disputes according to the litigant＇s petition of lawsuit and defence,thirdly,investigates relevant facts on the basis of free intention in accordance with the disputes and the evidence offered by the litigant and finally affirms the facts by the burden of persuasion unascertained by both litigants.

关 键 词：事实认定 客观真实说 法律真实说 法律适用 民事诉讼 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]