关于西方新史学的几点思考  

On Western New Historiography

作　　者：王树人[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院哲学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第5期28-34,共7页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：西方新史学与后现代主义思潮同步,是在史学领域对西方传统形而上学或逻各斯中心主义的颠覆。所谓微观史学之"碎片化",不过是打破宏大叙事独尊的僵化,使史学多元化。就破除文学与史学不可逾越的界限而言,有些趋向中国传统文史哲不分家的情调。新史学之新,本质上可以归结为思维方式的转变——趋向"想象"的"象思维",以及话语趋向"修辞学"(海登.怀特为代表)的转变。Western new historiography goes together with postmodernism,which is the subversion of Western traditional metaphysics and Logos centralism from a historical perspective.The so-called fragmentation of historiography at the micro level is just a breakthrough of its macro narrative rigidity,making historiography pluralistic.As for breaking through the boundary between literature and historiography,it tends to provide a big picture which can put literature,history and philosophy together.The uniqueness of new historiography in nature explains the change of thinking mode-towards ＂imagination＂-oriented ＂image thinking＂ and discourse-oriented rhetoric.

关 键 词：新史学 微观史 后现代主义 想象 象思维 

分 类 号：K01[历史地理—历史学]