霍米亚科夫论教派对立和俄国与西欧的差异  

A.S.Khomyakov's Perspectives on Transconfessional Oppositions and Differences between Russia and Western Europe

作　　者：杨明天[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学俄语系

出　　处：《俄罗斯研究》2010年第4期43-57,共15页Russian Studies

摘　　要：霍米亚科夫提出"聚和性"学说,把东正教理想化,东正教是他极力肯定的一面。霍米亚科夫一直把理想的东正教和现实的天主教、新教进行对比。他在西方信仰中看到的,差不多都是缺点;而在东方的俄国的信仰中,几乎没有看到任何缺陷。西方信仰是他极力否定的一面。霍米亚科夫期待,东正教通过俄国,可以导致所有文化体系的改革。这是他的使命论。在俄罗斯哲学中,霍米亚科夫最早把西方基督教和整个唯理论体系等同起来。他试图从教会思想引伸出哲学和所有文化的基础,但他偏离了教会。霍米亚科夫的思想模式有助于我们认识俄罗斯的心智特点。Khomyakov raised Sobornost Doctrines idealizing Eastern Orthodox,which is what he made utmost efforts to ensure.Khomyakov always compared ideal Eastern Orthodox Church with Catholicism and Protestantism in reality.In western beliefs,Khomyakov just saw almost all weakness,while he hardly found any weakness in eastern Russian beliefs.Western beliefs are just what he extremely wants to deny.Khomyakov hoped that the Eastern Orthodox could lead to reforms in all cultural systems,which are also his theories of mission.In Russian philosophy,it is Khomyakov who equated the western Christianity with the whole doctrines of rationalism.Khomyakov tried to originate foundation for philosophy and all cultures from the church thought,but he deviated from the church.Khomyakov＇s thinking pattern helps us understand characteristics of Russian mentality.

关 键 词：霍米亚科夫 聚和性 教派对立 俄罗斯 心智 

分 类 号：D512.4[政治法律—政治学]