群体性纠纷解决机制的建构原理  

Constructive Theories of Collective Disputes Resolution System

作　　者：吴泽勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2010年第5期81-101,共21页The Jurist

基　　金：德国洪堡基金会的资助

摘　　要：群体性纠纷带来问题的根源在于它与"两造诉讼"结构的紧张关系,但是,不同类型的群体性纠纷带来的挑战并不完全相同,对纠纷解决机制的要求也不尽相同。通过对西方国家代表性的群体性纠纷解决机制进行结构的、功能的和技术的比较,可以发现,行政机关执法、社会团体与行政机关提起的不作为之诉、撇去不法收益之诉、加入制群体诉讼、退出制群体诉讼分别适合特定类型的群体性纠纷;群体性诉讼中的费用风险问题,则可以通过诉讼费用制度、律师收费制度的调整或者第三方资助的途径解决。The problems coming with collective disputes stem from the tension between the disputes and the two-party structure of civil procedure,but different collective disputes pose different challenges,and raise different requirements of disputes resolution systems.Based on constructional,functional and technical comparisons among the representative collective disputes resolution systems in western countries,it is found that administrative enforcement of law,injunctive action taken by associations and administrative agencies,skimming-off action,opt-in collective litigation,opt-out litigation are suitable for certain categories of collective disputes.The financial risk of collective litigations can be reduced through adjustment of litigation fee and lawyer's fee and the third-party foundation.Nevertheless,in view of the problematic and approaches of this paper,the related conclusions cannot be understood as legislative propositions.

关 键 词：群体性纠纷 集团诉讼 示范诉讼 团体诉讼 行政机关执法 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]