检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李泉水[1] 邓水平[1] 张家庭[1] 熊华花[1] 陈胜华[1] 童红玉[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市第二人民医院超声科,广东省深圳市518035
出 处:《中国超声医学杂志》2010年第10期896-898,共3页Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
基 金:深圳市医学重点学科建设经费资助(No.2005CD6)
摘 要:目的探讨超声对乳腺导管原位癌(ductal carcinoma in situ,DCIS)的诊断价值。方法收集经手术病理确诊的导管原位癌患者33例,比较不同级别导管原位癌的超声表现及诊断符合率。结果高级别DCIS 13例,低-中级别DCIS 20例,术前超声提示可能恶性24例,超声对DCIS、高级别DCIS、低中级别DCIS诊断的符合率分别为72.7%、92.3%、60.0%。超声对高级别DCIS与低中级别DCIS的诊断敏感性差异有统计学意义(P=0.042)。低回声、形态不规则、微钙化是DCIS的超声表现的重要特征。结论超声对直径≥5mm的导管原位癌有很好的诊断价值,对高级别DCIS比低-中级别DCIS有更好的诊断价值。Objective To evaluate the diagnosis value of ultrasound (US), in breast ductal carcinoma in si tu. Methods All recorded 33 cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) in women from the Socond People's of Shenzhen were included. The accuracy rate and the US features of different grade DCIS were compared. Results There were 13 cases of high-grade DCIS and 20 cases low-intermediate-grade DCIS. Ultrasound indicated 24 possible malignant tumors. The accuracy rate of US of DCIS, high grade DCIS, low-intermediate-grade DCIS were 72.7%, 92.3% and 60.0 %, respectively. The differentiation diagnosis between high-grade DCIS and low-intermediate-grade DCIS was statistically significant(P= 0. 042). The important features of DCIS were hypoechoic,irregular in shape and a bit calcific on the US images. Conclusions US is of excellent diagnostic value in DCIS≥5 mm in diameter. US is of greater value in high-DCIS than in low-intermediate-grade DCIS.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3