FFA联合ICGA与传统分开造影不良反应的对比研究  

Analysis of effects of FFA combined with ICGA compared to traditional separated exam

作　　者：梁立群[1] 谢熙[1] 陈毅华[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省中山市人民医院眼科,528400

出　　处：《国际护理学杂志》2010年第10期1453-1455,共3页international journal of nursing

摘　　要：目的 探讨荧光素眼底造影（FFA）联合吲哚箐绿血管造影（ICGA）与传统分开造影不良反应的发生率。方法随机选择60例有指征行眼底造影检查的患者，实验组30例行FFA＋ICGA联合造影，对照组30例行FFA＋ICGA传统分开造影，观察各组不良反应的发生情况。结果（1）实验组（联合造影组）1例出现恶心、呕吐，对照组行FFA时1例出现一过性心慌、恶心，行ICGA时1例出现恶心。两组患者不良反应发生率无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。（2）两组患者注射造影剂前、中、后的血压、心率、血氧饱和度无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。结论FFA联合ICGA检查能提高眼底病的诊断效率。降低医疗成本，减轻患者两次造影的风险及痛苦，是安全可行的。Objective To study clinical effects of fundus fluorescein angiography （FFA） combined with indoeyanine green angiography （ICGA） compared to traditional separated exam. Methods Thirty patients in experiment group were undergone FFA combined with ICGA exams. The other 30 patients in tradition group were undergone ICGA exams a day after FFA exams by random. Complications of both groups were obsereved and studied. Results （ 1 ） One patient with nausea and vomit in experiment group was compared to one patient with nausea when FFA exam and one patient with nausea when ICGA exam in tradition group. There was no significant difference （ P 〉 0. 05 ） in digestive complications between two groups. （2） There was no significant difference （ P 〉 0. 05 ） in blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation coefficient when exam between two groups. Conclusions FFA combined with ICGA is a safe and effective exam method.

关 键 词：荧光素眼底造影 吲哚箐绿血管造影 联合造影 不良反应 

分 类 号：R77[医药卫生—眼科]