中德仲裁裁决执行制度比较  

A Comparative Study on the Implementation System of the Arbitral Awards between the Chinese and German Legal System

作　　者：秦瑞亭[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第5期107-115,共9页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：中德两国的仲裁法律制度具有共同点,亦存在明显差异。在仲裁裁决的执行方面,不仅中德两国的国内立法存在较大差异,而且两国在适用《纽约公约》方面也有明显不同。中国仲裁法区分公约裁决和非公约裁决,德国司法实践对所有外国仲裁裁决一律适用《纽约公约》。在对《纽约公约》第1条第1款第2项规定的"非内国裁决"的认定和执行方面,中国缺乏明确的法律规定,司法实践较为混乱。中国应借鉴包括德国仲裁法在内的先进仲裁立法的经验,尽快修改和完善1995年《仲裁法》。There are both similarities and obvious differences between the Chinese and German aibitration legal system.In the fields of enforcing arbitral awards,there are big differences not only on the domestic laws of China and Germany but also on the application of New York Convention 1958.The Chinese arbitration law has divided into Convention awards and non-Convention awards but New York Convention is applied to all foreign arbitral awards in German judicial practice.China has not suitable laws for qualifying and enforcing the＂Non - domestic award＂in the second sentence of the Article I 1 of New York Convention which makes confusion in judicial practice.Therefore,China should adopt experiences of the advanced arbitration legislation like the German arbitration law to revise and improve the Chinese Arbitration law 1995 as soon as possible.

关 键 词：非内国裁决 仲裁协议 仲裁裁决 纽约公约 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]