反映、反应和“文学审美意识形态”论  

Reflection,Reaction and the Theory of "Ideology of Literary Aesthetic"

作　　者：嵇山[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院文学研究所,上海200233

出　　处：《黑龙江社会科学》2010年第5期60-66,共7页Social Sciences in Heilongjiang

摘　　要：有论者提出并认为无人能置之"死地"的"审美反映",其实只是人的先验"意识"在外部刺激下的自我重组,不是人对外部世界的认知,即与承袭了康德"自在之物"不可知余绪的皮亚杰同出一辙,是反应,不是反映。而综观该论者同时提出的作为"客观因素""主观化"、"主观因素""对象化"中的"审美反映"和作为"与生俱来"、"融入"于文学"最基本的审美单位"的语言文字的"审美意识"、作为文学"本质特性"表示的"文学审美意识形态"的三者关系可知:所谓"文学审美意识形态"论,实际就是实行了语言学转向、属形式学派范畴又颇为彻底地与非"审美"、非文学的先验"意识"的自我表现文学论,并不"新鲜"。Someone puts forward and thinks that one＇s ＂aesthetic reflection＂ is not one＇s cognition of outside world but the self-reorganization of priori ＂consciousness＂ stimulated from the exterior;that is,＂aesthetic reflection is not reflection but reaction.The same person mentioned above puts forward the three relations,of the ＂aesthetic reflection＂ in subjectivity of objective factors and objectivity of Subjective factors,of the ＂aesthetic consciousness＂ in spoken and written Languages as the ＂most basic aesthetic unit＂ and the ＂ideology of literary aesthetic＂ as literary ＂essential feature＂,which shows that so-called theory of ＂literary aesthetic ideology＂ is actully a change direction of linguistics,a caterory of formal school and a literary theory of self-expression of ＂non-aesthetic＂ and non-literary propri ＂consciousness＂,which is not new thing.

关 键 词：“审美反映” “审美意识” “文学审美意识形态” 语言学转向 

分 类 号：J1[艺术—艺术理论]