辩诉交易与刑事和解之比较  

Plea Bargaining and Criminal Reconciliation:Comparisons

作　　者：谢晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]襄樊学院经济与政法学院,湖北襄樊441053

出　　处：《襄樊学院学报》2010年第9期52-58,共7页Journal of Xiangfan University

基　　金：湖北省教育厅人文社科研究项目(2009b371)

摘　　要：辩诉交易与刑事和解是当代刑事法中两种最主要的刑事合意解决纠纷机制。二者具有诉讼效率的一致性,但也有参与主体、内容、适用范围等诸多不同之处。任何制度都是具体语境的产物,辩诉交易虽在英美广泛适用,但难以适应中国司法实践的需要,而刑事和解则应是目前中国刑事司法改革的优先选择。Criminal reconciliation and plea bargaining are two important criminal unanimity mechanism to resolve dispute in contemporary criminal law.Although plea bargaining is the same as criminal reconciliation in contentious efficiency,they have some differences in subject,content and scope.Any system has its own specific context,although plea bargaining is widely used in American,it is difficult to adapt to the needs of the Chinese judicial practice.So,criminal reconciliation should be the priority choices for China＇s criminal justice reform.

关 键 词：刑事合意 刑事和解 辩诉交易 

分 类 号：DF714[政治法律—诉讼法学]