检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李耀俊[1] 忻文雷[1] 阮征[1] 厉祯[1] 魏巍[1] 黄远亮[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属东方医院口腔科,上海200120
出 处:《口腔颌面外科杂志》2010年第5期338-340,共3页Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
摘 要:目的:分析两种拔除下颌埋伏阻生第三磨牙方法的临床效果。方法:门诊30例46颗下颌低位水平阻生智齿,采用锤凿法和涡轮钻法去骨术拔除,观察手术时间、术后并发症发生情况。结果:两种方法拔牙的手术时间和术后局部肿胀程度有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论:合理的去骨设计和熟练的操作能缩短下颌水平阻生智齿的拔除时间,减轻术后局部肿胀反应。Objective: To evaluate the efficacy by different methods using the extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom tooth. Methods: Thirty cases with 46 low impacted wisdom teeth were randomly and equally divided into two groups: chisel extraction group and high-speed air turbine drill extraction group. The operative time, postoperative complications were observed. Results: There was significantly difference between the two groups in the operative time and complication of facial swelling (P〈0.01). Conclusion: No matter what kind of method, a reasonable design and the experience of the surgeon can reduce the extraction time and complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117