检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李继武[1]
出 处:《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第5期10-17,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:目前有学者将经济学意义上的财富概念的发展归纳为四次转变形态,但由于没有以实践思维方式为指导分析论证,因此,对财富概念的演进历程和各形态的本质归属解释得难以到位,缺少哲学理论底蕴。人们的财富本质定位不但因人们从事不同实践形式在不同时期有所差异,即使经济学意义上的财富本质定位,也会因生产实践各产业形式的演化不同,而其本质定位有所不同。本文用生产实践解释了这种财富本质定位的转换过程,启示人们对财富观念一定要辩证地看,切忌形而上学。Some scholars sum up the development of the concept of wealth from the angle of economic meaning in four phases currently. But there is a lack of an analysis based on practical thinking, so the explanation of evolution process of the concept of wealth and the essence of each phase is not perfect and lacks the foundation of philosophical theories. The positioning of the essence of wealth differs due to people's engagement in dissimilar fulfill- ment form in the different periods. Even if from the angle of economic meaning, it varies because of the different evolution of each industrial form. The paper applies the production practice to explain the transmission of the positioning of the essence of wealth, and suggests that people must form a dialectical idea of the wealth and eradicate metaphysics.
分 类 号:B17[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15