刑事司法权力优化配置:权力运行类型学视阈  

On the Optimization of Criminal Judicial Power:In the View of Typology of Power Operation

作　　者：吴常青[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学,天津300134

出　　处：《江西公安专科学校学报》2010年第4期54-58,共5页Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College

基　　金：四川省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目<刑事判决形成过程的实证研究>(SC09Z003)

摘　　要：根据刑事诉讼中权力运行特征,可将刑事司法归结为权力放纵型和权力抑制型两种类型。权力放纵型司法强调权力集中、注重权力协作、权力不受限制、程序工具化;权力抑制性型司法强调权力分立、注重制衡、权力严格限制、程序实质化。我国刑事司法权力运行倾向于权力放纵型,需要通过限权、权力/权利制衡和程序的实质化,以实现权力抑制型司法。The criminal judiciary may be defined two ideal types:the type of power exercising and the type of power restraining,according to power operation.The type of power exercising emphasizes on the centralization,cooperation,and without restriction of power,and criminal procedure as a tool.The type of power restraining emphasizes on the separation,balance and restriction of power,and the substance of criminal procedure.The operation of power in our country mostly is the type of power exercising.We should perfect the operation of criminal judicial power in order to realize the type of power restraining.

关 键 词：理想类型 权力放纵型 权力抑制型 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]