法官刑事自由裁量权及其界域新论  

On Criminal Discretion Right and Its Boundary

作　　者：陈荣飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《江西公安专科学校学报》2010年第4期59-63,共5页Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College

摘　　要：法官刑事自由裁量权行使得当与否和公民基本人权能否得到恰如其分的保护唇辅相连,厘定法官刑事自由裁量权内涵、夯实其现实基础、探寻其价值理念及划定其运作的合理边界是我国刑事司法实践中亟待解决的一项重要命题。法官行使自由裁量权之宗旨是实现司法正义,即在具体个案中彰显常识、常理、常情,其具体理路为刑法适用解释、刑事判决说理公开制度及人民陪审制。It is important to redefine connotation、analyze realistic basis、seek value idea and determine boundary of judge criminal discretion ,which is closely connected with citizen basic right. The goal of judge who exercising criminal discretion is to satisfy judicial justice,that is to say,common sense、general knowledge and general reason which should be used to direct the interpretation of criminal law、criminal judgment pubic reasoning system and people jury system.

关 键 词：刑事自由裁量权 常识、常理、常情 刑法适用解释 刑事判决公开说理制度 人民陪审制 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]