检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭生诚[1] 梁成文[1] 黄玉宁[1] 廖婧[1] 李洁[1] 黎红[2,1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西口腔医学院,四川成都610041 [2]浙江中医药大学附属口腔医院口腔修复教研室,浙江杭州310005
出 处:《临床医学工程》2010年第9期3-4,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基 金:四川省科技支撑项目(2009FZ0065);四川大学大学生创新实验项目资助
摘 要:目的比较不同刷头牙刷清除龋病易患区(磨牙区)牙菌斑的效果。方法对30名志愿者进行自身前后对照试验,分别使用3种不同刷头的牙刷按Bass法刷牙3分钟,刷牙前后按改良的Quigley-Hein菌斑指数各做1次菌斑评价。每种牙刷连续测试3天,间隔1天后再进行另一种牙刷的测试。结果 3种牙刷刷牙后各象限菌斑指数均下降。相同象限不同牙刷间,刷牙后磨牙区菌斑指数下降值无统计学差异。相同牙刷不同象限间,刷牙后磨牙区菌斑指数下降值无统计学差异。结论在正确刷牙方法的情况下,不同刷头牙刷对磨牙区菌斑去除效果的影响无明显差异。Objective To compare plaque removal(molar area) by toothbrushes with different toothbrush heads.Methods 30 volunteers participated in the before and after self-controlled trial.Volunteers were scored for plaque by molar area and then brushed with Bass technique for 3 minutes and were scored again after brushing.The trial consisted of three periods,each of which included three days and was for one toothbrush.A washout of one day was allowed between periods.Results In each quadrant plaque index decreased significantly after brushing with each toothbrush.Plaque removal scored by molar area were not significantly different between different toothbrushes in the same quadrant.And they were not significantly different too between quadrants when the volunteer used the same toothbrushe.Conclusion In the case of a correct brushing method,there is no significant difference in plaque removal(molar area) by toothbrushes with different toothbrush heads.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249