检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡建次[1]
出 处:《西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第5期50-55,共6页Journal of Northwest Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:2007年度国家社会科学基金项目"中国古代文论承传研究"(项目编号:07cwz001);江西省社会科学"十一五"规划项目"中国古典词学理论批评承传研究"(项目编号:08wx37)的阶段性成果
摘 要:清代词学批评对传统词学宗尚的消解主要体现在两大维面:一是对婉约与豪放词风宗尚的消解,二是对南北宋词宗尚的消解。上述维面中,前者主要体现为对词作体派与风格高下之论的破解,后者主要体现为对词作艺术表现模式优劣之论的破解。此两方面共构互渗,从一个侧面有力地标示出清代词学批评的理论水平与历史高度。The Qing Dynasty Ci criticisms to the two traditional Ci preference deconstructions were mainly represented in two dimensions,one was the deconstruction of graceful Ci,bold Ci,and the other was the deconstruction of Ci preference in North and South Song Dynasty.In the two above-mentioned dimensions,the former is reflected in the deconstruction of High and low quality of Ci style and the latter in the deconstruction of the good and bad artistic reflection mode.The two aspects were interdependent and they displayed strongly the theoretical level and historical height of Qing Dynasty Ci Criticism level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.51.7