马克思主义与后现代批评家(下)  

Marxism and post-modern critic(second part)

作　　者：高海涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁文学院,沈阳110032

出　　处：《沈阳工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2010年第4期519-523,共5页Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering:Social Science

摘　　要：马克思主义并非是某种具体的文学理论或批评理论,但马克思主义批评却是西方后现代文学与文化研究中最重要的批评思潮,代表性批评家不仅有美国的杰姆逊和英国的伊格尔顿,几乎从各种批评流派的方法实践中都可找到马克思主义的思想资源和影响痕迹。通过阅读原著,以马克思主义的"总体性"和后现代批评的"解构"为比较视点,在后现代多元语境中对有关批评的理论话语进行了分析梳理,提出包括结构主义、解构批评在内的众多批评理论,都在某种程度上对马克思主义方法有所借鉴,同样,马克思主义批评也对其他的批评方法有所吸收与整合,因此,与其说存在某种特殊的马克思主义批评方法,不如说存在着多样化的马克思主义批评立场。Marxism is not certain actual literary or critical theory,but Marxist criticism is the most important criticism thought of western post-modern literature and culture research,the representative critics include Fredric Jameson in the United States and Terry Eagleton in Great Britain,almost all the method practice of criticism schools can be traced to Marxist idea resource and influence.By reading original work and taking the Marxist totality and deconstruction of post-modern criticism as comparative points,analyzes and organizes the theoretical speech related to criticism in post-modern multivariable context,puts forward that structuralism,deconstruction criticism and many criticism theories use Marxist methods for reference to certain degree,similarly Marxist criticism also absorbs and integrates other critical methods.Therefore,diversified Marxist critical position is rather than special Marxist critical method.

关 键 词：总体性 解构 马克思主义批评 后现代批评 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]