检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国家电网公司高级培训中心,北京100192 [2]中国人民大学经济学院国民经济管理系,北京100872
出 处:《能源技术经济》2010年第11期62-65,共4页Electric Power Technologic Economics
摘 要:评价自然垄断的效率问题不能仅从理论出发,而要从电网企业实际经营绩效判断。国家电网公司经营绩效评估可以按市场活力、技术创新、内部管理、社会责任4个领域的指标进行分析,可进一步细分为24个子指标。绩效评估指标体系的实证分析表明,国家电网公司的经营绩效为较好,至少并不存在所谓的"X-非效率"问题,也反映了政府对电网企业的监管是有效的。未来改革的关键不在于打破垄断或者输变电一体化与否,而在于继续完善监管体系、进而形成更加富有激励的制度安排。With reference to efficiency evaluation for the natural monopoly, it is more appropriate to evaluate a power grid company based on its actual performance rather than the existing theory per se. State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) assesses the performance with an index system reflecting the four aspects of market dynamics, technology innovation, internal management and social responsibility, which can be further divided into 24 sub-indexes. Empirical study of the performance evaluation index system indicates good performance of SGCC, with no so-called "X-inefficiency" problems at least, and effective government supervision of the power transmission sector. Instead of breaking down the monopoly or separating power transmission from distribution, the power reform in the future should focus on perfecting the supervision system and establishing more efficient incentive mechanisms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222