检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡鲲[1] 黄宣运[1] 姜有声[1] 方伟[2] 朱泽闻[3] 杨先乐[1]
机构地区:[1]上海海洋大学农业部渔业动植物病原库,上海201306 [2]广东省水生动物疫病预防控制中心,广东广州510222 [3]全国水产技术推广总站,北京100026
出 处:《上海海洋大学学报》2010年第6期805-809,共5页Journal of Shanghai Ocean University
基 金:上海市科技兴农重点攻关项目(6660106477);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200803013);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(nyhyzx07-042);现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(NYCYTX-49-17)
摘 要:为了快速、灵敏地检测禁用药物环丙沙星在水产品中的残留,建立了基于单克隆抗体的间接竞争酶联免疫法(competitive indirect ELISA,ci-ELISA),并比较了其与高效液相色谱法(High Performance LiquidChromatography,HPLC)在灵敏度、准确性和重现性等方法学参数上的差异。实验结果显示,经过浓缩、净化等前处理过程,ci-ELISA与HPLC的检测灵敏度分别可以达到10μg/kg和1μg/kg,回收率分别为79.28%~92.92%和86.27%~97.32%,相对标准偏差分别在3.21%~8.88%和2.66%~5.52%。前者经济、高效,适合作为初筛方法大批量筛选样品;后者灵敏度、重现性更好,适于在实验室条件下作为验证方法。For sensitive and specifically detection of ciprofloxacin (CIP) residues in fishery products,this study is aimed at generating and developing a competitive indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ciELISA) based on CIP-specific monoclonal antibodies (McAb) .The sensibility,accuracy and repeatability of ci-ELISA method was compared to those of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC) method.By concentration and purification process,the limit of detection (LOD) of ci-ELISA and HPLC method could reach to 10 μg /kg and 1 μg /kg respectively.we detected the recovery rates were 79.28%-92.92% and 86.27%-97.32% while relative standard deviation (RSD) varying from 3.21%-8.88% and 2.66%-5.52% for these methods.Between the two methos,ci-ELISA method was cheaper and more efficient while HPLC method was more sensitive and stable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249