语用维度的认知语言学阐述:CI与SA  

Illustrations of Pragmatic Dimension in Cognitive Linguistics——with CIs and SAs as Examples

作　　者：温金海[1] 张家荣[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学外语学院,江苏南京210003 [2]哈尔滨商业大学外语学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150028

出　　处：《南京财经大学学报》2010年第5期104-108,共5页Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics

摘　　要：文章指出,认知语言学以动态整体为本,于语言使用中窥探和寻找概念者的操作程序,是一种真正的跨学科性质的语言综观,它对个体认知的细节具备足够的解释力,所采用的研究方法和路径主要涉及图形/背景原则、象似性举枚、范畴典型、意象图式、ICM组构、隐转喻映射和在线空间合成等。而语用学仅仅在静态的研究传统上增加一些弥补性措施,结果导致它与语义学的分庭抗礼,是对客体语言的结构性分化,依然停留在语义+语境=语用的粗浅认识上,并且其语境概念多半带有社交情结。采用这项标准来衡量语用学中的两个中心议题:CI和SA可以证实并巩固此前的论断。但仅此尚不足以保证文中的论点丝毫没有纰漏之处,所以剩下的语用分支将另文著述以求稳妥。Cognitive linguistics aims to probe into the conceptualizers＇ operational procedures by means of exploring language usage as a dynamic whole so that it turns out to be a real generic perspective on language across disciplines and has enough explanatory capacity to treat individual cognitive details.Methods adopted here mainly include figure/ground principle,instantiations of iconicity,prototypical categorization,image schemata,ICM structuring,metaphorical/metonymic mappings,on-line space blending...etc.Pragmatics is simply incrementing a remedial measure on the static convention of linguistic studies,thus leading to its separation from semantics.Such structural cutting-up of the objective language remains relying on a coarse realization of ＂Pragmatics=Semantics ＋ Context＂ of which the latter in most cases bears the communicative complex.Employing this criterion to weigh up two central issues（CI and SA） in Pragmatics can prove and consolidate the argument held previously hereby.However we can＇t guarantee its perfection only by these two,and some branch issues left intact will be thus presented somewhere else to further deepen the base of our argumentation.

关 键 词：语用学 会话含义 言语行为 认知语言学 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]