基于粪便DNA的马鹿种群数量和性比  被引量:17

Population size and sex ratio of wapiti ( Cervus elephus xanthopygus) as revealed by fecal DNA

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:田新民[1,2] 张明海[1,3] 

机构地区:[1]东北林业大学野生动物资源学院,哈尔滨150040 [2]牡丹江师范学院生物系,牡丹江157012 [3]国家林业局野生动物保护学重点开放性实验室,哈尔滨150040

出  处:《生态学报》2010年第22期6249-6254,共6页Acta Ecologica Sinica

基  金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30870309);黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目(ZJN-0501);美国老虎和犀牛基金资助项目(98210-2-G191)

摘  要:为分析黑龙江省完达山林区马鹿种群生存状态,制定科学有效地保护措施,从分子水平研究了种群数量和性比。2006、2007两年冬季跟踪马鹿足迹链,于五泡林场共搜集210份粪便,以成功提取DNA的167份作为分析样本。通过多态性较高的7个微卫星位点进行了基因分型分析,显示167份粪便DNA分属66只个体。基于非损伤性标志重捕法,统计出林场内马鹿数量2a平均47(39—60)只,密度0.302(0.251—0.386)只/km2,与2002年大样方法调查结果相比有减无增。SRY基因性别鉴定显示,种群雌雄性比1.00∶2.00(22♀,44♂),存在较多雄性个体,分析认为偷猎是导致性比失衡的最主要原因。数量的持续下降和性比失衡提示完达山林区马鹿种群数量的恢复需要更好地保护工作。The part of Wandashan Mountains, located in Heilongjiang province, was the area that the density of wapiti was very high. In recent years, the amount of wapiti declined extremely because of many reasons, such as human activity and illegal hunting. For taking conservation measures scientifically and efficiently, we probed into population size and sex ratio, and analyzed its living conditions in this region by molecular method. This method is a good way exactly to obtain the population demography and much information of population genetics, and is widely adopted by great many researchers. We collected 210 fecal samples of wapiti in Wupao forestry farm of Wandashan Mountains in two winter seasons, in 2006 and 2007, by tracking fresh foot chains. Finally, we successfully isolated 167 total DNA from them. We used 7 microsatellite loci that published in other's papers, with high polymorphic characters, to identify the genotypes of these fecal DNA by capillary electrophoresis. The identification result showed that these 167 fecal DNA belong to 66 individuals respectively. Using noninvasive capture-mark-recapture method, the population quantity was estimated. The theory of noninvasive capture-mark-recapture method is same as common capture-mark-recapture method that is generally used in ecology. The difference between two methods is that common capture-mark-recapture method needs to capture animal individuals, and the latter don1 need to do that. Instead of capturing animal individuals, researchers only need to collect fecal pellets along animal's foot chains. The advantage of common capture-mark-recapture method is that wild animals need not to be killed or injured anymore. Based on noninvasive capture-mark-recapture method and the genotype data from 66 individuals, the average quantity and density of wild wapiti, promenading in the forestry farm, were estimated at 47 individuals ( ranged 39 --60) and 0. 302 individual per square kilometer (ranged 0. 251 --0. 386). Comparing our result with the consequence t

关 键 词:马鹿 粪便DNA 种群数量 性比 

分 类 号:Q958[生物学—动物学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象