机构地区:[1]上海市普陀区人民医院神经内科,200060 [2]中南大学湘雅医院神经内科 [3]上海交通大学医学院生物统计教研室
出 处:《中国脑血管病杂志》2010年第11期579-583,共5页Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
基 金:上海市普陀区人民医院科研项目基金资助(2007RYK07Q-01)
摘 要:目的探讨老年卒中患者急性期血压变化特征及其与30 d预后的关系。方法采用前瞻性队列研究方法,连续登记2008年1月—2010年6月入院的老年卒中患者275例,其中脑梗死202例,脑出血73例。连续记录入院后7d的血压,在发病30d时评价预后。按照急性期7d内平均收缩压(120~139、140~159、160~179、180~199、>200 mm Hg)和舒张压(<69、70~79、80~89、90~99、>100 mm Hg)水平分别分为5个亚组,比较入院时和30 d时的改良Rankin量表评分(mRS)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(NIHSS)。结果①275例患者中,有66例预后差,其中脑出血组22例,脑梗死组44例,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.200)。两组急性期7 d内不同平均收缩压的30d预后差者的5个亚组预后比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而急性期7 d内,不同平均舒张压水平的30d预后差者,5个亚组比较,除70~79mmHg与80~89mmHg两组间差异无统计学意义外(P>0.05),其余各亚组之间预后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②平均收缩血压在160~179mmHg者,mRS(中位数2)和NIHSS(中位数7)评分较低,相应30d改善显著(mRS中位数差值为2,NIHSS中位数差值为4);平均舒张压>100 mmHg,提示预后差,mRS和NIHSS评分30d改善的比较,不同舒张压亚组两两比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。脑出血组平均舒张压在70~90mmHg范围内,往往预后较好;脑梗死组在70mm Hg以下者,预后最好。结论老年卒中患者急性期7 d内平均收缩压在160~179 mm Hg之间,30 d的预后较好;急性期平均舒张血压不能预测病情的严重程度,但可反映30 d预后转归的倾向。Objective To investigate the relationship between the blood pressure changes in acute phase of stroke in elderly patients and its prognosis at day 30. Methods A total of 275 consecutive elderly patients with stroke were documented from January 2008 to June 2010 using a retrospective cohort study. Among them, 202 were cerebral infarction and 73 were intracerehral hemorrhage. Their blood pres- sures were continuously recorded at the first seven days. The prognosis of patients were evaluated at day 30 after onset of stroke. The patients were divided into 5 subgroups according to the mean systolic blood pressure (120- 139, 140 -159, 160- 179, 180 -199, and 〉 200 mm Hg) and the mean diastolic blood pressure ( 〈69, 70-79, 80-89, 90-99, and 〉100 mm Hg) within7 days in the acute phase of stroke. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission and at day 30 were compared. Results (1)Of the 275 patients, 66 had poor prognosis,among them 22 were in the intracerebral hemorrhage group and 44 in the cerebral infarction group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0. 200). As for the mean systolic blood pressure in the acute phase ( within 7 days) for both groups and the different mean systolic blood pressures in 5 subgroups in patients with poor prognosis at day 30, there were significant difl'erenees for their prognosis ( P 〈 0.05 ). While the mean diastolic blood pressure within 7 days in the acute phase and the patients whose prognosis was poor, the prognostic comparison of the different mean diastolic blood pressures in all subgroups, except for 70 - 79 mm Hg and 80 - 89 mm Hg, there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Comparing the prognosis, there were significant differences between all other groups (P 〈 0.05 ). (2)When mean systolic blood pressure was 160 -179 mm Hg, the mRS scores (median 2) and NIHSS scores ( median 7) were low
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...