症状性椎基底动脉狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较  

Curative Effect Comparison of Different Treatments for Patients with Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis by Methods

作　　者：田方起[1] 李斌[1] 苏兰[1] 顾红菲[1] 赵桂森[1] 练红[1] 潘瑞红[1] 牟振弘[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津市大港油田总医院神经内科,300280

出　　处：《中国全科医学》2010年第33期3799-3801,共3页Chinese General Practice

摘　　要：目的探讨症状性椎基底动脉狭窄患者经皮腔内血管成形和支架植入术(PTAS)的治疗效果。方法将35例症状性椎基底动脉狭窄患者随机分为两组,比较症状性椎基底动脉狭窄患者药物保守治疗18例和PTAS治疗17例的疗效有无差异。结果药物保守治疗和PTAS治疗症状性椎基底动脉狭窄患者疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经PTAS是治疗症状性椎基底动脉狭窄的一种好的治疗方法。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of PTAS andstenting inpatientswithsymptomatic vertebrobasilar artery（VBA） stenosis.Methods 35 patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery（VBA） stenosis were randomly divided into 2 groups.Compare the curative effect of 18 cases treated by drug therapy and 17 cases by PTAS in the patients.Results The difference of curative effect by Drug therapy and PTAS treatment in symptomatic patients with vertebrobasilar artery stenosis was significant（P 0.05）.Conclusion PTAS is a good method of treating symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis.

关 键 词：椎底动脉供血不足 药物疗法 血管成形术 气囊 支架 

分 类 号：R743.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]