检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张松方[1] 夏士安[1] 吴国华[1] 姚原[1] 查元梓[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院肿瘤科,上海2000030
出 处:《中国医学物理学杂志》2010年第6期2227-2229,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
摘 要:背景与目的:鼻咽癌放射治疗,面颈联合野已作为标准的射野设计,用一个中心半束射野解决了面颈联合野与颈部切线野的衔接问题,但面颈联合野内存在剂量冷点与热点,剂量均匀性差。因此本研究希望就鼻咽癌放射治疗面颈联合野中进行野中野的设计作一些探讨。方法:在设计半束照射面颈联合野时,使野的下部最大剂量保持在105%左右,再在野的上部加射野的设计方案。结果:根据治疗计划系统(treatment planning system,TPS)计算,由于是一个中心的半束射野,面颈联合野与颈部切线野的衔接处无冷热点,在面颈联合野内加入野中野和颈部切线野,故比用两个中心设计的,面颈联合野与颈部切线野,技术员摆位更简单,更准确。其剂量分布比单一的面颈联合野更均匀,更合理。95%的等剂量线包容颅底及鼻咽处肿瘤体积(gross tumor volume,GTV)时,下颈及口咽部最高点剂量为105%左右,而且高剂量区容积也小。结论:用一个中心半束面颈联合野中野和颈部切线野方法照射,比单一面颈联合野照射时,剂量分布更均匀,更合理,比两个中心面颈联合野与颈部切线野照射时,技术员摆位更简单,衔接处的剂量更准确。Objective:In the 3DCRT plan of nasopharyngeal cancer,face-neck-field has became a standard.The problem of fields gap between the face-neck-field and the tangential low eck-supraclavicular field was solved by mono-isocentric technique,however,the dose distribution within the face-neck-field was heterogeneous with "hot" and/or "cold" spots.This study is to explore a "field in field" technique in the design of face-neck-field in nasopharyngeal cancer.Methods:When designing beam-split face-neck-field,the hot spots in lower part should be less than 105%,and a small field will be added to the beam-split face-neck-field by "field in field" technique.Results:According to the calculation result of TPS,there are no "hot" and/or "cold" spots between the face-neck-field and the tangential low neck-supraclavicular field which is benefit from using the beam-split field with one isocenter.Adding small field and the tangential low neck-supraclavicular field to the face-neck-field lead to better dose distribution,95% isodose line covers the volume of the skull base and GTV,while the maximum dose in the lower neck and pharynx is about 105% of prescribed dose,the volume of high dose is also smaller.And the technique makes the setting up more easier and more accurate.Conclusions:The beam-split face-neck-field and the tangential low neck-supraclavicular field with mono-isocentric radiation technique makes the dose distribution more uniform and reasonable than single face-neck-field radiation technique.Also,setting up of the patient is more easier and the dose between fields gap is more accurate than bi-isocentric radiation technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.241.170