侦查机关通过监听所获材料之证据能力研究  

Research on the Admissibility of Material by Investigative Authorities Monitoring

作　　者：陈学权[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2010年第12期52-58,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：作者主持的2010年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题<技术侦查与证据采信>(项目号:GJ2010C02)的成果

摘　　要：我国法律对侦查机关通过监听所获材料的证据能力虽有规定,但不够明确。判断侦查机关通过监听取得的材料有无证据能力,既需要考虑赋予一般证据材料证据能力的普遍性要求,还需要考虑监听取证本身固有的属性。我国对于侦查机关通过非法监听所获证据材料的排除,应当采取法定强制排除、酌情裁量排除和允许瑕疵证据补救相结合的做法。There are some uncertainty provisions on the admissibility of material by Investigative Authorities Monitoring in Chinese law. Whether determining the admissibility of material by investigative authorities monitoring,we need to consider both the general requirements of the admissibility of material and inherent properties of monitoring. We should establish combined approach of statutory exclusion,discretionary exclusion and remedy defects about material by investigative authorities illegal monitoring.

关 键 词：监听 视听资料 证据能力 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]