检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实用口腔科杂志》2010年第11期687-688,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的比较Dyract AP复合体和GC Fuji IX GP两种材料修复牙体楔状缺损的临床效果。方法选择2007年9月至2009年10月,在四川省德阳市口腔医院口腔内科就诊的患者181例,共567颗中等以上深度楔状缺损牙,随机分为A、B两组,A组采用Dyract AP复合体充填修复,B组采用GC Fuji IX GP充填修复,随访1年,评定成功率。结果 A组回访256颗患牙,成功225颗,成功率87.89%;B组回访248颗患牙,成功196颗,成功率79.03%。两组成功率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 Dyract AP复合体修复楔状缺损优于GC Fuji IX GP。Objective This study is to compare the clinical effect of two kinds of materials in restoration of wedge-shaped defects of teeth.Methods The 181 cases(567 teeth)of medium or more depth of dental wedged-shaped defects were randomly divided into two groups.The defects of group A were restored by Dyract AP complex and group B by GC Fuji IX GP.The clinical effect was evaluated after observation for one year.Results For the 256 teeth in Group A,225 succeeded in restoration;for the 248 in Group B,196 succeeded.The success rate of group A was 87.89%,group B 79.03%.There was statistical difference between the two groups(P〈0.01).Conclusion The clinical effect of Dyract AP complex is superior to the GC Fuji IX GP in treating the wedge-shaped defects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.247.50