检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张婕[1] 王纯[2] 张宁[2] 武欣[2] 郭苏皖[2] 欧红霞[2]
机构地区:[1]山东科技大学心理咨询中心,青岛266510 [2]南京医科大学附属脑科医院医学心理科
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2010年第6期371-373,共3页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
基 金:江苏省自然科学基金(BK2008083)
摘 要:目的:验证团体归因训练对抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症患者的临床治疗效果。方法:54例抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症患者按照入组到开始治疗的时间分为3个基线组,每组进行为期8周的归因训练团体治疗,采用多基线实验设计,每隔2周评定汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HA-MA),治疗前后评定抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS),强迫症组加测Yale-Brown强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)。结果:所有被试者治疗前后HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS量表得分差异均有统计学意义(t=18.41,19.85,6.33,6.97,P<0.01);强迫症组治疗前后Y-BOCS得分差异有统计学意义(t=5.47,P<0.001);所有被试治疗前后社会功能改善显著(Z=-6.41,P<0.001)。结论:团体归因训练对抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症患者治疗有效。Objective:To explore the curative effects of the attribution retraining on the major depression disorder(MDD),anxiety disorder(AD)and obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD). Method:Fifty four outpatients with MDD,AD or OCD were divided into 3 groups,which were treated with the attribution retraining.Multiple baseline method was adopted in the experimental research design and the curative effects were assessed using self anxiety scale(SAS),self depression scale(SDS),Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA),Hamilton depression scale(HAMD),social disability screening schedule(SDSS)and Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale(Y-BCOS)at the baseline and week 2,4,6,8. Results:After treatment,the three groups showed significant differences compared with the baseline in SDS,SAS,HAMA and HAMD(t=18.41,19.85,6.33,6.97,P0.01).OCD group demonstrated significant differences from the baseline in Y-BOCS(t=5.47,P0.001).The social function of all the patients improved remarkably(Z=-6.41,P0.001). Conclusion:The group attribution retraining can be effective in the treatment of MDD,AD and OCD.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15