后牙残冠残根的根管桩修复的临床体会  

作　　者：李增祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川成都市第六人民医院,610000

出　　处：《当代医学》2010年第34期82-83,共2页Contemporary Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较残冠残根不同修复方法的治疗效果。方法将203颗患牙根据缺损情况分为3组,分别采取铸造桩核全冠、玻璃纤维桩复合树脂核全冠、成品螺丝钉桩银汞核或复合树脂等修复方法进行治疗。结果 203颗患牙2年随访治疗效果:进行铸造桩核全冠成功率达96%;进行纤维树脂桩核全冠成功能为92.3%;进行成品螺纹钉桩核银汞核或复合树脂核全冠治疗成功率为88.5%。结论铸造桩核全冠和玻璃纤维桩树脂核全冠治疗效果优于成品螺纹钉桩加银汞合金核或树脂核全冠。Objective To compare the residual crown and root of different repair methods of treatment. Methods 203 teeth were divided into 3 groups according to defect were taken to cast post core and crown,glass fiber post and composite resin core and crown,finished screw pile amalgam or composite resin restoration of nuclear methods of treatment. Results 203 teeth were 2-year follow-up treatment：to cast post core and crown the success rate of 96%; for fiber resin post core and crown the success to 92.3%; be finished screw post-core silver amalgam or composite resin core nuclear crown treatment success rate was 88.5%. Conclusion The cast post core and crown,and glass fiber post and resin core and crown treatment is better than refined screw pile and silver amalgam or resin core nucleus.

关 键 词：成品螺纹桩 铸造桩核 玻璃纤维桩 复合树脂核 

分 类 号：R783.3[医药卫生—口腔医学]