民事证人评价制度的技术建构  

Establishing the Witness Assessment Institution in Civil Procedure

作　　者：赵信会[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东经济学院法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《现代法学》2010年第6期157-167,共11页Modern Law Science

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划项目<民事执行检察监督研究>(09YJA820043);中国法学会2010年部级课题<证人出庭作证制度研究>(CLS-C1023)

摘　　要：我国民事诉讼法以及民事诉讼理论一直以来以中立证人观规定、理解证人,也以证人与案件、当事人有无利害关系作为判断证人证词证明力的重要方法。其实证人都在一定程度上、一定方式上与案件或当事人有这样或那样的关系,中立的证人不仅是一种乌托邦的设想,同时与现代诉讼制度改革是异质的。为此,应在反思传统中立证人观的基础上,确立与之适应的证人评价法,这就是矛盾评价法。For the purpose of the Civil Litigation Act and civil procedure theories, the witness is always provided or understood as a neutral one and witness＇ s having no interest with respect to the case or the parties is also an important criterion to judge the weight of his/her testimony. However, to some extent or in some way, a witness is normally associated with a party or parties and a neutral witness is but a Utopian hope which is inconsistent with the present reform of procedural institution. As such, based on a criticism of the traditional neutral witness doctrine, a correspondent witness assessment way, i.e. ＂contradiction assessment way＂ should be taken.

关 键 词：证人评价 中立证人 矛盾评价 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]