检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚文健[1] 白玉[2] 赵国昌[1] 王永连[1] 师启众[1] 王忠民[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省新乡医学院第一附属医院胸外科,453100 [2]河南省新乡医学院病理教研室,453003
出 处:《医学信息(下旬刊)》2010年第12期14-15,共2页Medical information
摘 要:目的:探讨食管癌患者焦虑、押郁情绪的发生率及其相关因素,为临床心理干预提供依据。方法:将120例食管癌病人分为干预组及对照组各60人,应用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)进行问卷调查。结果:干预前两组SDS、SAS均大于50分,干预后干预组病人抑郁、焦虑率低于对照组,差异具有显著性意义(P〈0.01)。干预组和对照组在性剐、年龄、职业类型上没有统计学差异。在文化程度、经济情况、家人支持上,干预组要好于对照组。结论:食管癌患者中普遍存在焦虑和抑郁情绪,积极的。理干预,能减轻焦虑、抑郁的发生率,提高食管癌患者的生存质量。To detect the rate of anxiety, depression of patients with esophageal cancer and relative factors, to provide the experiment proof for clinical psychological interventions. Method : 120 cases patients with total esophageal cancer were divided into control group(60 cases) and intervention group (60 cases). All patients were investigated via filling out self -- rating anxiety scale(SAS) and self -- rating depression scales(SDS). Results: The SAS and SDS scores of two groups were higher than 50 before intervention. After the intervention, anxiety and depression rates of intervention group were lower than that in control group,and the difference was significant( P 〈0. 01). There was no statistical difference in sex, age, and occupation between two groups. The educational level, economy and family support in the intervention group was significantly better than that in the control group. Conclusion: Anxiety and depression were popular among the patients of esophageal cancer. Positive psychological intervention could reduce the incidence of anxiety and depression, and improve the living quality of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249