DN:CAS认知评估系统在小学生认知发展评估中的应用  

The Application of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System in Examining Chinese Primary School Students' Cognitive Development

作　　者：王晓辰[1] 李清[2] 邓赐平[3] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学工商管理学院,杭州310018 [2]浙江传媒学院社科部,杭州310018 [3]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062

出　　处：《心理科学》2010年第6期1307-1312,共6页Journal of Psychological Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(编号:30470581);上海市教育科学研究重点项目(编号:A0820)的资助

摘　　要：研究采用汉化版DN:CAS认知评估系统对3-5年级小学生的计划-注意-同时性加工-继时性加工过程进行评估,并考察DN:CAS的信效度。结果表明:汉化版DN:CAS具有良好的信度、效标关联效度和构念效度;验证性因素分析结果在某种程度上为DN:CAS的结构提供了支持,表明PASS理论和DN:CAS适用该年龄范围的我国青少年儿童。PASS四因素模型不论是从统计分析结果还是理论基础上都胜过(PA)SS三因素模型,这与Das等人的理论较为吻合。The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Das-Naglieri：Cognitive Assessment System （D-N：CAS） in Chinese primary school students. One hundred and fifty students of 3rd to 5th grades,aged from 8 to 12 years old,who were recruited from two primary schools in Fu Ding City,Fujian Province,China,were assessed on measures of PASS processes,i.e. CAS. The confirmatory factor analysis （CFA） was used to examine the factor structure of CAS in Chinese. Maximum likelihood estimation procedures were used to analyze the variance/covariance matrix of the observed variables using AMOS 17. To evaluate the model fit,the chi-square value and a set of fit indices were used：（a） the Comparative Fit Index （CFI）; （b） the Goodness of Fit Index （GFI）; and （c） the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation （RMSEA）. The results showed that the PASS model fitted the data very well. The fit indices obtained were：χ2 = 48.95,χ2/df=1.02,p=.425,CFI=1.00,GFI=0.95,AGFI=0.91 and RMSEA=0.012. Besides,the authors also compared the factor loading of the model based on the data collected in the study and that based on an American sample （ages 8-10 years） taken from the CAS manual （Naglieri Das,1997）. The results indicated that the factor loadings for the Chinese and the American were very similar indeed. The results also showed that the Chinese version of DN：CAS was reliable and had sound criterion related validity and construct validity. According to the statistical results,a conclusion could be drawn that the four-factor-PASS model was better than three-factor-（PA）SS model,which was quite consistent with the original theoretical assumption put forward by Das et al. In a word,the results of confirmatory factor analysis in the study provided statistical support for the structure of DN：CAS in some sense,indicating both the PASS theory and DN：CAS were suitable to the Chinese children in the age range.

关 键 词：DN:CAS认知评估系统 信度 构想效度 因素分析 

分 类 号：B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学]