检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学口腔医学院附属南京市口腔医院牙周科,江苏南京210008
出 处:《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》2010年第12期1764-1767,1777,共5页Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基 金:南京市医学科技发展专项项目资助(ZKX07022)
摘 要:目的:回访分析采用超声波根尖倒预备的根尖手术术后1年临床疗效,并与常规根尖倒预备法对照分析。方法:回访分析根尖切除术病例98例,其中采用常规根尖倒预备(conventional technique,C组)的58例,采用超声波根尖倒预备(ultra-sonic root end preparation,U组)的40例。采用双盲分析法对这些病例的临床效果进行评估。结果:超声波根尖倒预备组(U组)的1年成功率为90.0%,其中切牙为92.6%,前磨牙为84.6%。常规根尖倒预备组(C组)的1年成功率为82.8%,其中切牙为91.2%,前磨牙为70.8%。结论:根尖倒预备能够提高根尖切除术的临床疗效。超声波倒预备比常规根尖倒预备的成功率高,超声波倒预备利于更严密地封闭根尖。Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of an ultrasonic device in apical surgery on the outcome of treatment when comparing with conventional technique using a bur.Methods:A case-control study was used in a standardized treatment protocol.98 patients were treatment with an ultrasonic device or with a bur for preparation.One year after treatment the results were sorted and numbered by another clinician.The results were evaluated by a third dentist who was blinded for the therapy.Results:The overall success rate in the ultrasonic group was 90.0% and in the group treated with a bur 82.8%(P 〉 0.05).In premolars,the difference in success rate was 84.6% in ultrasonic group and 70.8% in conventional group(P 〉 0.05).Conclusion:The use of an ultrasonic device in apical surgery improved the outcome of treatment.Ultrasonic preparation could get better cannel obturation than conventional technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.210.233