不同方法固定外伤性松动牙的效果  

The Effect of Different Methods to Fixed Traumatic Loosening of Teeth

作　　者：罗锦兰[1] 涂春梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省东莞市桥头医院口腔科,广东东莞523520

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2011年第1期27-28,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的观察不同固定方法对外伤性松动牙的临床疗效,以期寻找一种疗效确切美观的牙固定方法。方法选择外伤性Ⅱ～Ⅲ度松动牙的患者165例共计243颗患牙,将患者随机分为3组,每组各55例81颗牙,A组采用金属丝结扎法、B组采用钢丝-釉质黏合法、C组采用方丝弓托槽固定法,分别记录患者牙齿受伤情况、固定情况,治疗3个月临床疗效及牙周检查情况。结果采用钢丝-釉质黏合法临床疗效优于采用金属丝结扎法组与采用方丝弓托槽固定术组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在牙龈炎、牙周袋形成、牙槽骨吸收等方面的改变差异性显著(P<0.01)。结论钢丝-釉质黏合法治疗外伤性牙松动临床疗效显著,是值得临床推广的好方法。Objective To research the clinical efficacy of different fixation methods on the loose teeth traumatic,find an effective method.Methods Select Ⅱ～Ⅲ degree of traumatic teeth loose 165 patients with 243 bad teeth,patients were randomly divided into 3 groups,each of the 55 patients with 81 teeth,A metal wire ligation group,B group with steel wire-enamelsticky legal,C group Edgewise brackets with fixation,record the injuries,fixed,clinical efficacy of treatment for 3 months and periodontal inspection.Results Steel wire-enamel sticky legal efficacy is superior to the group and the ligation wire Edgewise bracket with fixation group,the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）,the gingivitis,periodontal pocket formation,alveolar bone resorption change is significantly（P0.01）.Conclusion Steel wire-enamel sticky legal treatment of traumatic tooth mobility significant clinical efficacy,it is worth to clinical practice.

关 键 词：外伤 牙松动 固定 

分 类 号：R782[医药卫生—口腔医学]