分权理论在防止公诉权滥用中的运用  

Power Separation Rationale in the Deterrence of Prosecution Power Abuse

作　　者：谢小剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学法学院,江西南昌330032

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第2期133-139,共7页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：分权作为防止权力滥用的基本方法,同样可运用于防止公诉权滥用。在宪法框架下,公诉权附属于行政权,或成为独立的法律监督权,与其他政治权力分立制衡;在诉讼程序中,公诉权独立于侦查权和审判权;在公诉权内部表现为公诉权主体的多元化,检察一体化下检察官之间的分权,公诉提起权、公诉决定权与支持公诉权的分权。As a basic method of power abuse, power separation can be applied to deter prosecution abuse. Constitutionally, prosecution either attaches to the administration,or as a independent legal supervising power, checks and balances other powers. In criminal procedure, it manifests by the independence from investigation and trial. Within prosecution, it is proved by the existence of various prosecution agencies, separation of power between individual prosecutors and the separation of charge, decision and disposition.

关 键 词：分权 公诉权滥用 检察权 检察一体 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]