检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李长茂[1]
机构地区:[1]娄底市中心医院,417000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2010年第36期21-23,共3页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的评价动脉瘤栓塞术治疗蛛网膜下腔出血的效果。方法选取娄底市中心医院2007年1月至2010年1月收治的31例采用动脉瘤栓塞术的蛛网膜下腔出血患者(观察组),并与同期30例采用常规治疗方法的患者(对照组)进行比较。结果观察组中31例中28例动脉瘤完全闭塞,2例残余轻微显影,1例轻瘫;对照组中8例动脉瘤完全闭塞,15例CTA检查显影,7例死亡(合并瘫痪3例),两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05),观察组预后效果优于对照组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论动脉瘤栓塞术治疗蛛网膜下腔出血疗效确切,值得临床推广。Objective To evaluate treatment of aneurysm embolization effect of subarachnoid hemorrhage.Methods The hospital in January 2007-2010 on Jan.31 patients in Loudi central hospital aneurysm embolization with subarachnoid hemorrhage patients(observation group) and compared with 30 cases of patients with conventional treatment(control group).Results 31 patients in the observation group,28 patients with aneurysmal occlusion,2 cases of mild residual enhancement,1 paresis;the control group,complete aneurysm occlusion in 8 cases,15 cases of CTA,developing,7 deaths(3 cases of paralysis combined),the two groups was statistically different(P0.05),the prognosis is better than the observation group compared with the control group significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion Aneurysm embolization is effective treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage,it is worth to be popularized.
分 类 号:R743.35[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.87.133