机构地区:[1]山东大学齐鲁医院检验科,济南250012 [2]济南市传染病医院检验科
出 处:《中华检验医学杂志》2011年第1期61-65,共5页Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30672010)
摘 要:目的 探讨血浆sHLA-G在诊断CIN及宫颈癌中的应用价值.方法 采用ELISA检测102例宫颈癌患者、72例CIN患者和20名健康对照者血浆sHLA-G水平,并分析其对宫颈癌的诊断价值及与宫颈癌临床病理参数间的关系.其中,宫颈癌患者经FIGO分期分为:Ⅰ期32例、Ⅱ期28例、Ⅲ期25例、Ⅳ期17例;按肿瘤大小分为:<4 cm 63例、≥4 cm 39例;按病理组织类型分为:鳞癌78例、腺癌24例;高分化57例、中分化29例、低分化16例;无淋巴结转移64例、淋巴结转移38例.CIN患者中Ⅰ级21例、Ⅱ级25例、Ⅲ级26例.结果 血浆sHLA-G在宫颈癌组为193.6(151.3~287.4)kU/L,CIN Ⅰ级组为48.3(34.6~57.2)kU/L、CIN Ⅱ级组为91.3(68.2~118.6)kU/L、CIN Ⅲ级组为106.4(73.8~165.7)kU/L、健康对照组为45.2(38.0~55.5)kU/L;各组间血浆sHLA-G水平差异有统计学意义(H=13.287,P<0.01),且宫颈癌组明显高于CIN Ⅰ级组、CIN Ⅱ级组、CIN Ⅲ级组及健康对照组(U值分别为8.832、6.456、4.017、9.873,P均<0.05);CIN Ⅱ级组和CIN Ⅲ级组血浆sHLA-G水平明显高于CIN Ⅰ级组和健康对照组(U值分别为4.361、4.892、5.139、5.485,P均<0.05).SCC-Ag在健康对照组、CIN Ⅰ级组、CIN Ⅱ级组、CIN Ⅲ级组和宫颈癌组的水平分别为0.43(0.38~0.69)μg/L、0.47(0.35~0.72)μg/L、0.65(0.53~0.81)μg/L、0.82(0.54~1.03)μg/L和1.02(0.62~1.87)μg/L.宫颈癌组血浆SCC-Ag水平明显高于CIN Ⅰ级组、CIN Ⅱ级组及健康对照组(U值分别为7.926、4.877、8.132,P均<0.05);CIN Ⅲ级组血浆SCC-Ag水平明显高于CIN Ⅰ级组和健康对照组(U值分别为6.574、6.763,P均<0.05).CA125在健康对照组、CIN Ⅰ级组、CIN Ⅱ级组、CIN Ⅲ级组和宫颈癌组的水平分别为14.38(6.14~21.82)kU/L、15.42(6.25~23.53)kU/L、21.34(9.82~32.58)kU/L、25.69(14.47~38.71)kU/L和27.72(14.29~43.87)kU/L.宫颈癌组血浆CA125水平明显高于CIN Ⅰ�Objective To explore the application value of plasma sHLA-G in diagnosis of CIN and cervical cancer. Methods The plasma sHLA-G levels were detected by ELISA in 102 cases with cervical cancer( FIGO Ⅰ stage 32 cases, Ⅱ stage 28 cases, Ⅲ stage 25 cases and Ⅳstage 17 cases; tumor size:<4 cm 63 cases and ≥4 cm 39 cases; squamous cell carcinoma 78 cases and adenocarcinoma 24 cases;cell differentiation:well 57 cases, moderate 29 cases and poor 16 cases; lymph nodes metastasis negative64 cases and positive 38 cases ), 72 cases with CIN( Ⅰ grade 21 cases, Ⅱ grade 25 cases and Ⅲ grade26 cases ) and 20 cases of healthy controls. The diagnostic value of sHLA-G and its correlations with clinical parameters were analyzed. Results The plasma levels of sHLA-G were 193.6( 151.3-287.4 ) kU/L in cervical cancer group, 48.3( 34.6-57.2 ) kU/L in CIN Ⅰ group, 91.3( 68.2-118.6 ) kU/L in CIN Ⅱ group, 106.4( 73.8-165.7 ) kU/L in CIN Ⅲ group and 45.2( 38.0-55.5 ) kU/L in health control group.The level of sHLA-G was significantly higher in cervical cancer group than that in CIN Ⅰ group, CIN Ⅱ group, CIN Ⅲ group and healthy control group( U value of 8.832, 6.456, 4.017, 9.873, P < 0.05,respectively ). The level of sHLA-G was significantly higher in CIN Ⅱ group and CIN Ⅲ group than that in CIN Ⅰ group and health control group( U value of 4.361,4.892, 5.139, 5.485, P <0.05, respectively ).The levels of SCC Ag in healthy control group, CIN Ⅰ group, CIN Ⅱ group, CIN Ⅲ group and cervical cancer group were 0.43( 0.38-0.69 )μg/L, 0.47( 0.35-0.72 )μg/L, 0.65( 0.53-0.81 )μg/L, 0.82( 0.54-1.03 )μg/L and 1.02( 0.62-1.87 )μg/L. The level of SCC-Ag was significantly higher in cervical cancer group than that in CIN Ⅰ group, CIN Ⅱ group and healthy control group( U value of 7.926, 4.877, 8.132,P <0.05, respectively ). The level of SCC-Ag was significantly higher in CIN Ⅲ group than that in CIN Ⅰ group and health control group( U v
关 键 词:可溶性人类白细胞抗原G 宫颈上皮瘤变 宫颈癌 鳞状细胞癌相关抗原 糖抗原125
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...