检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田海峰[1] 王平凡[1] 苑星[1] 李含志[1] 顾以茼[1]
出 处:《河南医学研究》1999年第3期236-237,共2页Henan Medical Research
摘 要:目的: 探讨食管癌切除两种不同重建方法的优劣。方法: 通过对230 例食管中段癌切除后,在胸顶部以上( 超胸顶组) 用吻合器行食管胃吻合160 例、颈部手工吻合( 颈部组)70 例重建消化道的对比研究。结果: 两组在食管切除长度、吻合口瘘、食管上切缘癌残留及总体死亡率方面均无显著差异( P> 0 .05) ,而在手术时间、减轻手术损伤、减少吻合口狭窄的发生率方面,超胸顶组明显优于颈部组( P< 0 .05) 。结论:Objective: Discussion of esophageal carcinoma of midpiece resecting two regions and reconstruction methods.Methods: A comparisive study on reconstruction of the digestive tract was carried out in 230 cases of resection of esophageal carcinoma of midpiece,160 cases of esophagogastrostomy at the thoracic opex with instrument of anastomosis(group Ⅰ);70 cases of anastomosis at neck by hand (group Ⅱ).Results: No difference in esophageal resected lenth,anastomotic fistula,carcinoma residual rate between these 2 groups ( P >0.05),and group Ⅰ was superior to group Ⅱ in shortening operation time,abatement operative injury,reducing incidence of anastomotic stenosis ( P <0.05).Conclusion: The method of group Ⅰ was ideal and effective to reconstruct esopagus after resection of esophageal carcionoma of midpiece.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56