环境伦理学目的性理论的内在矛盾  

The Inherent Contradictions of Environmental Ethics Teleology

作　　者：陈也奔[1] 张玉华[2] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江省社会科学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001 [2]鹤岗市环境保护局,黑龙江鹤岗154101

出　　处：《环境科学与管理》2011年第1期191-194,共4页Environmental Science and Management

摘　　要：环境伦理学的目的性理论有其内在的矛盾。一是它没能说清自然的整体目的与个体目的之间的关系,它们是从属的关系,还是各自独立的关系?二是它在坚持自然目的性的时侯,忽略了人的精神目的性。当它去解释自然事件时,用的是前一种关系,而当它去解释人类的精神事件时,又用了后一种关系.在这个地方,罗尔斯顿的理论陷入了二元论。There are intrinsic contradictions in the environmental ethics teleology. The first, it has not clarified the relationship between the whole natural goal and the individual goal, whether they are the subordinate relations or respectively independent relations？ Second, it neglects the person＇s spiritual purposiveness, when it insisting natural purposiveness. When it explains the natural events, what kind of relation it uses is the former, when it explains the human spiritual events, it uses the latter. In this point, Rolston＇s theory fell into the dualism.

关 键 词：自然目的性 环境伦理 机体哲学 自然价值 罗尔斯顿 

分 类 号：X3[环境科学与工程—环境工程]