国(境)外医疗纠纷处理相关法律制度比较研究  

Comparatively studying the legal system abroad for dealing with medical dispute

作　　者：曹艳林[1] 刘久畅[1] 段行如[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国医学科学院医学信息研究所,北京100020

出　　处：《中国卫生事业管理》2011年第1期50-52,共3页Chinese Health Service Management

基　　金：卫生部2008年招标委托项目;中国医学科学院医学信息研究所基本科研业务费专项项目的部分研究成果

摘　　要：近年来,国家为缓解医疗纠纷数量持续增多、医患关系紧张的现状,不断完善相关法律法规,虽然在一定程度上起到了积极的作用,但是仍存在法律适用"二元化"等问题,需要借鉴和吸收国外先进的立法经验。文章通过比较美国、德国、法国、日本、荷兰、俄罗斯和我国台湾地区与医疗纠纷处理相关的法律法规,并结合我国实际情况在概念界定、归责原则、举证责任、事故鉴定、赔偿范围等方面进行比较分析,提出相关建议和意见。In recent years, number of medical dispute keeps greatly increased. And the relationship between doctors and patients has been deteriorated. The government has improved relative laws and rides to solve these problems,which has played a positive role. But for the application of the law, problems such as dualization still existed. So it is necessary to study advanced legislation experiences abroad. By comparing the legal system of medical dispute in US,Germany,France,Japan,Holland,Russia and Taiwan （ China）, and combining with China＇ s status, some aspects as conception definition, principia of liability, burden of proof, medical accident appraisal and coverage of compensation were analyzed. Based on which, some countermeasures and suggestions were put forward.

关 键 词：国(境)外 医疗纠纷 法律制度 比较 

分 类 号：R-051[医药卫生]