是历史主义,还是伪造历史?——再评《大秦帝国》  

Historicism,or Sham History——Re-comment on "The Grand Chin Empire"

作　　者：陈辽[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省社会科学院文学研究所,江苏南京210013

出　　处：《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第1期15-19,共5页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：在历史题材小说创作中要遵循历史主义原则,而历史真实性则是历史主义的核心和精髓。大量的史料证明,孙皓晖所著《大秦帝国》中所谓"大秦帝国"、"六国分秦"等说法,都不符合历史事实;所谓张仪与孟子辩论的情节是杜撰的;其他如屈原、公孙衍及商鞅等人物的历史也被歪曲;孙皓晖所谓"秦国的‘铁血文明’是中国文明史的根基"的说法以及热捧秦始皇,颂法反儒的做法,都背离了历史真实,是伪造的历史,经不起历史实践的检验。只有基于历史事实的创作,才是真正的有价值的作品。The creation of historical stories should follow the principle of historicism,and the reality of history is the core of and essence of historicism.Many historical materials manifest that the so called ＂Chen Empire＂ and ＂the six states divided Chen＂ described in ＂The Grand Chin Empire＂ written by Sun Haohui are true to the historical facts.The plot of the debate between Zhang Yi and Menzi is also false.And other historical events such as Qu Yuan,Gongsun Heng and Shang Yang are distorted.Sun Haohui＇s so called ＂the iron and blood civilization of Chen＂ is the base of Chinese civilization history＂ and the actions of extolling Chen First Emperor and praise legalist school against Confucianism are all away from historical facts and the sham history.They cannot be tested by historical practice.The creation based on the facts is the real valuable creation.

关 键 词：历史主义 孙皓晖 《大清帝国》 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]