基于网络写作语料的师生评改对比研究  

An Online Writing Corpus-based Comparative Study Between Teacher and Student Revision

作　　者：张福慧[1] 戴丽红[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学

出　　处：《中国外语》2011年第1期78-84,共7页Foreign Languages in China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(07AYY003);教育部人文社科青年项目(08jc740009)成果之一

摘　　要：在外语写作教学领域,同学互评逐步成为与教师评改并存的促进写作过程化提高的主要方式。本文基于网上写作中心一文三稿的写作实验,对比研究在线单一教师评改和多位同学评改的质与量,发现两种评改方式并未引发作文质量提高在统计意义上的差异,且同学互评视角不同,利于作者深入理解自己作品的不足。据此认为基于写作平台的在线同学互评在复合型英语专业写作教学资源和课时安排紧张的情势下,可尝试为主要的评改方式,以加快学生写作自主学习步伐。Peer revision, together with teacher revision, has gradually become a major component in enhancing students＇ writing. However the effect that teacher and peer revision exert on students＇ writing is seldom evidence-based. The study addresses the issue based on an online multidraft writing and revision experiment. 41 subjects are divided according to their timed writing score into two groups with evenly distributed scores. One group only receives single teacher revision, while the other group receives 4 peer revisions. The results show that both groups improve significantly in multi-draft writing, and that there is no significant difference in writing improvement between the two groups in terms of content. The illustrated examples in the study show that peers serve both as readers and critics, comments on the focal issue in the writing from different perspectives, thus deepening students＇ understanding of their own works and accordingly increasing their awareness of audience in latter drafts. With regards to the above research findings, the study suggests that online peer revision seems to be one substitute for teacher revision when writing faculty and other resources are not readily available. Using peer revision, students can accelerate their writing progress through much practice and mutual support.

关 键 词：同学互评 教师评改 网络写作语料 

分 类 号：H315[语言文字—英语]