检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许娜[1] 欧阳昭[1] 杜庆锋[1] 王霜[1] 杨军[1] 王瑜[1] 刘晓力[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院血液科,广州510515
出 处:《中华血液学杂志》2011年第1期25-28,共4页Chinese Journal of Hematology
基 金:广州市科技攻关计划重点引导项目(2006Z3-E0401)
摘 要:目的 探讨接合物蛋白(CRKL)的磷酸化水平在伊马替尼治疗慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)中的临床意义.方法 分别采用筑巢式PCR扩增ABL激酶区序列、实时荧光定量PCR法、流式细胞术检测35例CML患者不同时期52份骨髓标本ABL激酶区点突变、BCR-ABL基因转录水平、CRKL磷酸化水平,分析CRKL磷酸化水平与前两者的关系.结果 15例伊马替尼耐药患者中6例(40.0%)检测到ABL激酶区点突变,涉及四种类型氨基酸的改变,分别为Y253H 1例、E255K 1例、T315I 3例、F317L 1例,其中2例(T315I、Y253H)处于急变期,3例(E255K、T315I、F317L)处于加速期,1例(T315I)处于慢性期.初诊组BCR-ABL mRNA水平高于伊马替尼治疗有效组(P=0.01);伊马替尼耐药组BCR-ABL mRNA水平高于伊马替尼治疗有效组(P=0.03);伊马替尼耐药组BCR-ABLmRNA水平与初诊组差异无统计学意义(P=0.18).伊马替尼耐药组与初诊组磷酸化CRKL阳性细胞百分率及平均荧光强度(MFI)均明显升高,两组差异无统计学意义(P=5.130;P=3.178);但初诊组较伊马替尼治疗有效组患者显著增高(P=0.000;P=0.01),伊马替尼耐药组较伊马替尼治疗有效组患者显著增高(P=0.000;P=0.02);磷酸化CRKL阳性细胞百分率、MFI与BCR-ABL mRNA表达水平存在正相关关系(P<0.05).结论 应用流式细胞术检测P210BCR-ABL主要底物CRKL蛋白的磷酸化水平,是快速便捷的检测CML患者酪氨酸激酶活性的方法,CRKL磷酸化水平可作为评价伊马替尼治疗CML的疗效指标.Objective To investigate the adaptor protein CRKL phosphorylation level( p-CRKL) and its significance in chronic myeloid leukemia(CML) treated with imatinib. Methods ABL kinase domain was amplified by nested RT-PCR, domain point mutations analysis by direct sequencing, BCR-ABL mRNA level by real time-PCR, and p-CRKL level by flow cytometry in 52 bone marrow samples from 35 CML patients,and the relationship of p-CRKL level with ABL kinase domain mutation and with BCR-ABL mRNA level was analyzed. Results In the 15 imatinib-resistant patients, ABL domain point mutations were detected in 6 with 4 types of nucleotide substitutions: T315I ( n = 3 ), Y253 H ( n = 1 ), E255 K and F317 L. The incidence of mutations in disease chronic phase ( CP), accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) was 25.00%,40.00% and 30.00%, respectively. The BCR-ABL mRNA level in newly diagnosed CML was higher than that in imatinib-responded patients (P =0.01 );and so did in imatinib-resistant patients than in imatinib-effective patients ( P = 0. 03 ). The level of BCR-ABL mRNA was not significantly different between newly diagnosed CML and imatinib-resistant patients. p-CRKL%, MFI showed a high degree of phosphorylation in newly diagnosed CML and imatinib-resistant patients(P = 5.130; P = 3.178 ). The level of p-CRKL % and MFI in newly diagnosed group was higher than that in imatinib responded group( P = 0.000; P = 0.01 ) and also higher in imatinib-effective group than in imatinib-resistant group (P = 0. 000; P = 0. 02 ). There was apositive correlation between the level of BCR-ABL expression and p-CRKL % ( and the MFI of p-CRKL)( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion It seems that p-CRKL detection might be helpful in predicting imatinib treatment outcomes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117