检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第1期56-58,共3页Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:在综合评价中,评价的对象往往受各种不确定性因素的影响而具有模糊性,将模糊理论与经典综合评价方法相结合得到的评价方法称为模糊综合评价方法,应用模糊综合评价方法进行评价将使结果尽量客观从而取得更好的实际效果。在模糊综合评价中,权值的分配主要靠人的主观判断,因素过多时就很难准确分配权重,本文尝试利用层次分析法来确定模糊综合评价法中的权向量从而建立评价模型。高校教师绩效评价是一个多指标,多属性并且具有模糊性的评价过程。利用本文提出的评价模型对高校教师绩效进行评价能够更客观,更科学地反映高校教师的绩效状况。In the comprehensive evaluation,the objects of the evaluation are often subjected by various factors,so that they are fuzzy.The combination of fuzzy theory and classical comprehensive evaluation method will make the evaluation more objective and good result can be got.This evaluation method is called fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.In the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation,the distribution of weights depends mainly on subjective judgments.It is difficult to distribute weights accurately when evaluative factors too much.This paper tried to use AHP to determine weight vector in the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.It is a multi-object,multi-attribute and fuzzy process of the performance evaluation of university teachers.Evaluation model proposed in this paper can make the performance evaluation of teachers more objective,more scientific.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46