检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫瑾[1] 方旭前 任长庆[1] 张旭[1,2] 赵保健
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军空军航空医学研究所附属医院分子病理中心,北京100081 [2]北京市表观生物技术有限公司,北京100085
出 处:《分子诊断与治疗杂志》2011年第1期6-9,共4页Journal of Molecular Diagnostics and Therapy
摘 要:目的应用变性高效液相色谱(DHPLC)结合甲基化特异性PCR(MSP),建立一种临床可行的MGMT基因启动子甲基化检测方法,并探讨其灵敏度和特异性。方法选取MGMT甲基化标准品、30例脑胶质瘤组织和5例正常脑组织作为研究对象,分别应用MSP和MSP-DHPLC方法进行MGMT基因启动子区甲基化检测,比较两种方法的检测灵敏度和肿瘤组织甲基化检测率。结果标准品MGMT甲基化检测,MSP-DHPLC检测灵敏度为1%;MSP检测灵敏度为10%。30例胶质瘤组织用常规MSP和MSP-DHPLC检测,发生甲基化的样本例数分别为15(50%)和24(80%),其中9例样本MSP检测为非甲基化,而MSP-DHPLC检测为甲基化。5例正常脑组织采用两种方法检测均为非甲基化。结论 MSP-DHPLC方法检测MGMT基因甲基化灵敏度高于常规MSP。Objective To develop a clinical feasible method to detect promoter methylation of MGMT by MSP-DHPLC and assess its sensitivity and specificity. Methods Methylation status of MGMT gene were detected using MSP and MSP-DHPLC methods respectively in 30 glioma tumor tissues, 5 non-tumor brain tissues, and 2 standard DNA with the purpose to compare the sensitivity of two detecting methods. Results The sensitivity of detecting MGMT gene methylation with MSP and MSP-DHPLC was 10% and 1% respectively. MGMT gene methylation was observed in 15(50%) tumor tissues with MSP and in 24(80%) tumor tissues with MSP-DHPLC, among which there are 9 samples can only detected through MSP-DHPLC but not MSP method. MGMT gene unmethylation were found in all non-tumor brain tissues detecting by both methods. Conclusion Detecting MGMT methylaiton with MSP-DHPLC method was more sensitive than MSP, indicating MSP-DHPLC may be a useful tool in clinical test ofMGMT gene rnethylation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222