检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵蕾[1]
机构地区:[1]华南农业大学人文与法学学院,广东广州510642
出 处:《法学论坛》2011年第1期155-160,共6页Legal Forum
摘 要:2005年我国《公司法》的修订增强了公司法条文的可诉性,同时也激化了公司法与民事诉讼法、司法介入与公司治理的矛盾。采纳大陆法系国家的非讼程序解决司法介入与公司治理的矛盾是不切实际的作法。目前最为现实可行的思路就是改革和完善现有的特别程序,将有关非讼程序理论合理地纳入特别程序,构建具有我国特色的公司特别程序。构建公司特别程序不仅为公司纠纷解决机制提供了更加快捷的途径,也为司法介入公司自治开创了第二条道路。The amendment of the company law in 2005 has strengthened the justiciable of the provisions.At the same time,it has sharpened the contradictions between company law and civil procedure law as well as the contradictions between judicial intervention and corporate governance.Drawing on the experience of non-contentious procedures of continental legal system to solve these conflicts is unrealistic.The most practical way is to reform and improve the existing special procedures and submit the non-contentious procedures theory into them,and establish the corporation special procedures with Chinese characteristics.Establishing the corporation special procedures can not only provide a more convenient way to solve the corporation disputes,but also creating a second road for the judicial intervention in corporate autonomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249