检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津职业技术师范大学职业心理与职业指导研究所,天津300222
出 处:《天津工程师范学院学报》2010年第4期55-59,共5页Journal of Tianji University of Technology and Education
基 金:天津市教育科学"十一五"规划项目(JGC024.)
摘 要:为探讨大学生自我效能感与情绪管理能力的状况及二者的关系,采用大学生情绪管理能力问卷和一般自我效能感量表对某大学206名学生进行施测。测试结果为:(1)大学生自我效能感状况处于中等水平(2.60±0.53),在年级、城乡、独生与否等变量上差异显著(P<0.05);(2)大学生情绪管理能力处在中等水平以上(3.62±0.40),在性别、城乡、独生与否、年级等变量上差异不显著(P>0.05);(3)大学生自我效能感与情绪管理能力存在中度正相关(r=0.313)。研究认为:大学生自我效能感越高,其情绪管理能力越强;大学生自我效能感越低,其情绪管理能力越弱。To explore the status of emotion management ability and general self-efficacy in college students and their relationship,206 students from a college are tested by emotion management ability questionnaire and general self-efficacy scale.The result shows that:(1)the general self-efficacy of college students are in a middle level(2.60±0.53)and college students from urban or rural,students from single or multiple children family and students of different grades have significantly statistical difference in general self-efficacy(P0.05);(2)the emotion management ability of college students are in the middle to upper level(3.62±0.40)and college students of different genders,students from urban or rural,students from single or multiple children family and students of different grades have no significantly statistical difference(P0.05)in emotion management ability;(3)there is a positive correlation in a middle level between general self-efficacy and emotion management ability in college students(r=0.313).It can be concluded that the higher college students′ self-efficacy is,the stronger students′ emotion management ability will be and vice versa.
分 类 号:G641[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222