检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王淼[1] 薛巧如[1] 姚敏菲[2] 谢正福[3]
机构地区:[1]广东省药品检验所生化室,广东广州510180 [2]中山大学化学与化学工程学院,广东广州510275 [3]广东省食品药品监督管理局审评认证中心,广东广州510080
出 处:《解放军药学学报》2010年第6期517-520,共4页Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
摘 要:目的对检测静脉注射人免疫球蛋白中IgG含量的3种方法进行比较。方法采用紫外分光光度法、酶联免疫法、高效亲和色谱法对静脉注射人免疫球蛋白进行IgG含量测定。结果紫外分光光度法与高效亲和色谱法及酶联免疫法之间有显著性差异,高效亲和色谱法与酶联免疫法之间无显著性差异,高效亲和色谱法的重复性较好,RSD为0.8%。结论为选定静脉注射人免疫球蛋白中IgG含量测定方法提供了依据。Objective To compare three methods for determination of the content of IgG in intravenous injection.Methods High-performance affinity,the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and ultraviolet spectrophotometry were used to determine the content of IgG in intravenous injection.Results The statistical analysis showed that there was significant difference between the results obtained from ultraviolet spectrophotometry,high-performance affinity and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,but no significant difference between the results of high-performance affinity and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.The result of the reproducible test from high-performance affinity was the best among the three methods.Conclusion This study helps choose a proper method to determine the content of IgG in intravenous injection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15